TY - JOUR
T1 - A Modeling Framework for Technical, Economic, Energetic, and Environmental Assessment of Produced Water Pretreatment from Oil and Gas Industry
T2 - Article No. 117026
AU - Lugo, Abdiel
AU - Mejia-Saucedo, Carolina
AU - Senanayake, Punhasa
AU - Stoll, Zachary
AU - Sitterley, Kurban
AU - Wang, Huiyao
AU - Kota, Krishna
AU - Kuravi, Sarada
AU - Fthenakis, Vasilis
AU - Kurup, Parthiv
AU - Xu, Pei
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Treatment and reuse of produced water (PW) generated from oil and gas industry can reduce PW disposal volume and costs, improve environmental sustainability, and offset freshwater uses. Due to the complexity and high scaling and fouling propensity of PW, PW pretreatment is essential to ensure the long-term operation of downstream desalination processes. This study developed a process modeling approach to evaluate pretreatment technologies through technical, economic, energetic, and environmental assessments to identify the impacts of each technology, such as costs, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions, to make informed decisions for integrated treatment train development and applications. The evaluated individual and combined PW pretreatment technologies included chemical softening (CS), chemical coagulation (CC), electrocoagulation (EC), and granular activated carbon (GAC) for removing key fouling and scaling constituents, such as hardness, silica, and organics. The main evaluation parameters include levelized cost of water ($/m3), cumulative energy demand (kWh/m3), specific energy consumption (kWh/m3), and carbon dioxide emissions (kg CO2-eq/m3). The case study evaluated the unconventional PW in the Permian Basin with total dissolved solids concentration of 130,000 mg/L. For pretreatment combinations, the implementation of EC+GAC was selected as the optimal choice due to its effectiveness and limiting the amount of waste for disposal. This study provided a modeling framework for optimization and integration of different pretreatment units accounting for three evaluation metrics (costs, energy, and CO2 emissions) to effectively evaluate their viability in PW applications centered on minimal- or zero-liquid discharge.
AB - Treatment and reuse of produced water (PW) generated from oil and gas industry can reduce PW disposal volume and costs, improve environmental sustainability, and offset freshwater uses. Due to the complexity and high scaling and fouling propensity of PW, PW pretreatment is essential to ensure the long-term operation of downstream desalination processes. This study developed a process modeling approach to evaluate pretreatment technologies through technical, economic, energetic, and environmental assessments to identify the impacts of each technology, such as costs, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions, to make informed decisions for integrated treatment train development and applications. The evaluated individual and combined PW pretreatment technologies included chemical softening (CS), chemical coagulation (CC), electrocoagulation (EC), and granular activated carbon (GAC) for removing key fouling and scaling constituents, such as hardness, silica, and organics. The main evaluation parameters include levelized cost of water ($/m3), cumulative energy demand (kWh/m3), specific energy consumption (kWh/m3), and carbon dioxide emissions (kg CO2-eq/m3). The case study evaluated the unconventional PW in the Permian Basin with total dissolved solids concentration of 130,000 mg/L. For pretreatment combinations, the implementation of EC+GAC was selected as the optimal choice due to its effectiveness and limiting the amount of waste for disposal. This study provided a modeling framework for optimization and integration of different pretreatment units accounting for three evaluation metrics (costs, energy, and CO2 emissions) to effectively evaluate their viability in PW applications centered on minimal- or zero-liquid discharge.
KW - carbon emissions
KW - pretreatment technology
KW - process modeling
KW - produced water treatment
KW - specific energy consumption
KW - techno-economic analysis
U2 - 10.1016/j.jece.2025.117026
DO - 10.1016/j.jece.2025.117026
M3 - Article
SN - 2213-2929
VL - 13
JO - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
JF - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
IS - 3
ER -