Abstract
Here, we highlight examples of post-reaction characterization in thermo- and electrocatalysis to present the challenges in obtaining reliable data to answer specific questions about the true identity of the active site and/or catalyst deactivation/degradation. We use this editorial to suggest to reviewers that, when formulating comments to authors that involve materials characterization after reaction testing, they should consider what specific, meaningful information can be attained or what targeted question can be answered that adds value to the individual paper and to the field in general, and how to reasonably obtain that data. In contrast, reviewers should avoid vague, open-ended comments that suggest unguided post-reaction characterization that would not add significant value to the report and, similarly, avoid comments that are substantial enough that they could form the basis of an entirely separate report.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3627-3630 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Inorganic Chemistry |
Volume | 64 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2025 |
NREL Publication Number
- NREL/JA-5100-92977
Keywords
- catalysis
- catalysts
- chemical structure
- deactivation
- materials