TY - JOUR
T1 - Bioenergy Pathways Within United States Net-Zero CO2 Emissions Scenarios in the Energy Modeling Forum 37 Study
T2 - Article No. 100209
AU - Sands, Ronald
AU - Wachs, Liz
AU - Lamers, Patrick
AU - Bahn, Olivier
AU - Beach, Robert
AU - Binsted, Matthew
AU - Blanford, Geoffrey
AU - Cai, Yongxia
AU - de la Chesnaye, Francisco
AU - Edmonds, James
AU - Goke, Leonard
AU - Harris, Chioke
AU - Hoehne, Christopher
AU - Kim, Gyungwon
AU - Kyle, Page
AU - McJeon, Haewon
AU - Orvis, Robbie
AU - Showalter, Sharon
AU - Sinha, Aditya
AU - Starke, Emma
AU - Vaillancourt, Kathleen
AU - Victor, Nadejda
AU - Volkmar, Peter
AU - Weyant, John
AU - Wood, Frances
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The Energy Modeling Forum 37 study is organized around carbon dioxide (CO2) mitigation scenarios reaching net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050 in the United States. This paper summarizes the potential contribution of bioenergy use in the electric power, transportation, industrial, and buildings sectors toward meeting that target based on model results. Thirteen modeling teams reported bioenergy consumption in the Reference and Net Zero scenarios. Consumption of bioenergy increased over time in the Reference scenario, from an average across models of 3.2 exajoules (EJ) in 2020 to 3.8 EJ in 2050. Average bioenergy consumption in 2050 increased further to 7.3 EJ in the Net Zero scenario. All scenarios that reach net-zero emissions required some form of carbon dioxide removal to offset emissions that are difficult to reduce. Carbon dioxide removal using bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage (BECCS) varies widely across models, up to 1000 Mt CO2 in 2050. Some models rely instead on direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), up to 2200 Mt CO2, and others use a combination of BECCS and DACCS. Model results show a strong inverse relationship between the amounts of BECCS and DACCS deployed. All modeling teams assumed a carbon sink from land use, land use change, and forestry, further offsetting a portion of emissions from fossil fuels and industry that are expensive to eliminate. Bioenergy consumption in 2050 decreased by an average of 1.5 EJ across eight models in a Net Zero+ scenario relative to the Net Zero scenario, due in part to a lower equilibrium carbon price resulting from optimistic cost assumptions for all energy technologies.
AB - The Energy Modeling Forum 37 study is organized around carbon dioxide (CO2) mitigation scenarios reaching net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050 in the United States. This paper summarizes the potential contribution of bioenergy use in the electric power, transportation, industrial, and buildings sectors toward meeting that target based on model results. Thirteen modeling teams reported bioenergy consumption in the Reference and Net Zero scenarios. Consumption of bioenergy increased over time in the Reference scenario, from an average across models of 3.2 exajoules (EJ) in 2020 to 3.8 EJ in 2050. Average bioenergy consumption in 2050 increased further to 7.3 EJ in the Net Zero scenario. All scenarios that reach net-zero emissions required some form of carbon dioxide removal to offset emissions that are difficult to reduce. Carbon dioxide removal using bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage (BECCS) varies widely across models, up to 1000 Mt CO2 in 2050. Some models rely instead on direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS), up to 2200 Mt CO2, and others use a combination of BECCS and DACCS. Model results show a strong inverse relationship between the amounts of BECCS and DACCS deployed. All modeling teams assumed a carbon sink from land use, land use change, and forestry, further offsetting a portion of emissions from fossil fuels and industry that are expensive to eliminate. Bioenergy consumption in 2050 decreased by an average of 1.5 EJ across eight models in a Net Zero+ scenario relative to the Net Zero scenario, due in part to a lower equilibrium carbon price resulting from optimistic cost assumptions for all energy technologies.
KW - bioenergy
KW - carbon dioxide removal
KW - climate change mitigation
KW - deep decarbonization
KW - model comparison
U2 - 10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100209
DO - 10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100209
M3 - Article
SN - 2666-2787
VL - 6
JO - Energy and Climate Change
JF - Energy and Climate Change
ER -