Comparative Study of Four Building Energy Simulations: Phase II: DOE-2.1, BLAST-3.0, SUNCAT-2.4, and DEROB-4

R. Judkoff; D. Wortman; B. O'Doherty

Comparative Study of Four Building Energy Simulations: Phase II: DOE-2.1, BLAST-3.0, SUNCAT-2.4, and DEROB-4

R. Judkoff, D. Wortman, B. O'Doherty

Building Technologies and Science Center

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Research output: NREL › Technical Report

Abstract

Four building energy analysis codes are compared using two direct gain building models with Madison, Wis., and Albuquerque, N. Mex., typical meteorlogical year (TMY) data. The results from all four codes disagree significantly.

Original language	American English
Number of pages	6
State	Published - 1981

NREL Publication Number

NREL/TP-721-1326

Keywords

analysis
analytical validation
building energy simulations
comparative studies
empirical validation
passive solar

Access to Document

https://www.nrel.gov/docs/legosti/old/1326.pdf

Cite this

@misc{914daae50ad44ced85c80ef0ce654b2f,

title = "Comparative Study of Four Building Energy Simulations: Phase II: DOE-2.1, BLAST-3.0, SUNCAT-2.4, and DEROB-4",

abstract = "Four building energy analysis codes are compared using two direct gain building models with Madison, Wis., and Albuquerque, N. Mex., typical meteorlogical year (TMY) data. The results from all four codes disagree significantly.",

keywords = "analysis, analytical validation, building energy simulations, comparative studies, empirical validation, passive solar",

author = "R. Judkoff and D. Wortman and B. O'Doherty",

year = "1981",

language = "American English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparative Study of Four Building Energy Simulations: Phase II: DOE-2.1, BLAST-3.0, SUNCAT-2.4, and DEROB-4

AU - Judkoff, R.

AU - Wortman, D.

AU - O'Doherty, B.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - Four building energy analysis codes are compared using two direct gain building models with Madison, Wis., and Albuquerque, N. Mex., typical meteorlogical year (TMY) data. The results from all four codes disagree significantly.

AB - Four building energy analysis codes are compared using two direct gain building models with Madison, Wis., and Albuquerque, N. Mex., typical meteorlogical year (TMY) data. The results from all four codes disagree significantly.

KW - analysis

KW - analytical validation

KW - building energy simulations

KW - comparative studies

KW - empirical validation

KW - passive solar

M3 - Technical Report

ER -

Comparative Study of Four Building Energy Simulations: Phase II: DOE-2.1, BLAST-3.0, SUNCAT-2.4, and DEROB-4

Abstract

NREL Publication Number

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this