Comparison of Home Retrofit Programs in Wisconsin

Stacey Rothgeb, Stacey Rothgeb (NREL Technical Monitor)

Research output: NRELSubcontract Report

Abstract

To explore ways to reduce customer barriers and increase home retrofit completions, several different existing home retrofit models have been implemented in the state of Wisconsin. This study compared these programs' performance in terms of savings per home and program cost per home to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of each program design. However, given the many variations in thesedifferent programs, it is difficult to establish a fair comparison based on only a small number of metrics. Therefore, the overall purpose of the study is to document these programs' performance in a case study approach to look at general patterns of these metrics and other variables within the context of each program. This information can be used by energy efficiency program administrators andimplementers to inform home retrofit program design. Six different program designs offered in Wisconsin for single-family energy efficiency improvements were included in the study. For each program, the research team provided information about the programs' approach and goals, characteristics, achievements and performance. The program models were then compared with performance results -- programcost and energy savings -- to help understand the overall strengths and weaknesses or challenges of each model.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages28
StatePublished - 2013

Bibliographical note

Work performed by NorthernSTAR Building America Partnership, St. Paul, Minnesota

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/SR-5500-57720

Other Report Number

  • DOE/GO-102013-3886

Keywords

  • audit
  • Building America
  • conservation
  • EE
  • energy assessments
  • energy efficiency
  • home energy costs
  • home energy programs
  • home performance
  • modeling
  • NorthernSTAR
  • residential
  • residential buildings
  • Wisconsin Home Energy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Home Retrofit Programs in Wisconsin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this