Abstract
The wider adoption of hydrogen in multiple sectors of the economy requires that safety and risk issues be rigorously investigated. Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) is an important tool for enabling safe deployment of hydrogen fueling stations and is increasingly embedded in the permitting process. QRA requires reliability data, and currently hydrogen QRA is limited by the lack of hydrogen specific reliability data, thereby hindering the development of necessary safety codes and standards [1]. Four tools have been identified that collect hydrogen system safety data: H2Tools Lessons Learned, Hydrogen Incidents and Accidents Database (HIAD), National Renewable Energy Lab's (NREL) Composite Data Products (CDPs), and the Center for Hydrogen Safety (CHS) Equipment and Component Failure Rate Data Submission Form. This work critically reviews and analyzes these tools for their quality and usability in QRA. It is determined that these tools lay a good foundation, however, the data collected by these tools needs improvement for use in QRA. Areas in which these tools can be improved are highlighted, and can be used to develop a path towards adequate reliability data collection for hydrogen systems.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 17845-17858 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 40 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC
NREL Publication Number
- NREL/JA-5700-82052
Keywords
- codes and standards
- components
- hydrogen
- hydrogen leasks
- quantitative risk assessment
- safety