Abstract
Direct-contact condensers for an organic Rankine cycle solar pond power plant are compared with conventional shell-and-tube condensers. Three types of direct contact systems are evaluated: drop type, bubble type, and packed columns. Methods used in the design of the direct contact systems are reviewed. Complete 5 MWe plants, including the solar pond, are e designed for each system, and theircapitalized costs compared. Direct contact condensers were found to be considerably less expensive than shell-and-tube condensers. However, the auxiliary equipment needed to prevent the buildup of noncondensables and to control working fluid losses negated much of the cost savings. Also, the direct contact systems were less efficient. Thus no significant advantages were found for the directcontact condenser systems.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 10 |
State | Published - 1984 |
NREL Publication Number
- NREL/TP-252-2337
Keywords
- direct-contact condenser
- Rankine cycle
- solar ponds