Floating Solar in Hydropower Reservoirs in the United States

  • Juan Gallego-Calderon
  • , Tyler Phillips
  • , Mucun Sun
  • , Tanveer Hussain
  • , Aaron Levine
  • , Evan Rosenlieb
  • , Marie Rivers
  • , Evan Bredeweg
  • , Ivan Arismendi
  • , Sarah Henkel
  • , Alex Cagle
  • , Bella Alvarado
  • , Alex Meyer
  • , Dan Berger
  • , Dana Olson
  • , Daniel Pardo
  • , Meghan Bringolf
  • , Jose Zayas
  • , Neal Simmons

Research output: NLRTechnical Report

Abstract

This report presents a comprehensive analysis of the feasibility of floating photovoltaics (FPV) in federally regulated reservoirs within the continental United States (CONUS) and to present a methodology for capturing the true costs of deployment, potential environmental impacts, and regulatory pathways for open-loop hydropower reservoirs. It is intended for stakeholders who may not be solar industry experts but who are interested in exploring the potential for FPV in their reservoirs. While there are promising opportunities, particularly in enhancing dissolved oxygen (DO) levels and potentially improving compliance with existing hydropower licenses, the current capital costs of FPV are not yet competitive with traditional land-based solar installations at the utility-scale when comparing the LCOE results. A competitive financial outlook is achievable when applying a 30% Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and considering a 5% reduction from the baseline capital expenditures (CapEx) at the Tuckertown Reservoir in North Carolina case study. The study is structured around three key pillars of research: technical potential, environmental impacts and regulatory considerations, and technoeconomic analysis. This report provides a nationwide assessment of the opportunities for FPV in terms of capacity, measured in direct current megawatts (MWDC), in reservoirs managed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Additionally, the report introduces a heuristic model for estimating the CapEx of utility-scale FPV projects (1-100 MW), offering a baseline cost estimate for stakeholders. Finally, the report applies these models to a case study of a hydropower reservoir in North Carolina to present site-specific results.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages59
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

NLR Publication Number

  • NLR/TP-6A20-92702

Other Report Number

  • INL/RPT-25-82657

Keywords

  • floating PV
  • floating solar
  • PV
  • resource assessment
  • solar

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Floating Solar in Hydropower Reservoirs in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this