IEA-Task 31 WAKEBENCH: Towards a Protocol for Wind Farm Flow Model Evaluation. Part 2: Wind Farm Wake Models

Patrick Moriarty, Javier Rodrigo, Pawel Gancarski, Matthew Chuchfield, Jonathan Naughton, Kurt Hansen, Ewan Machefaux, Eoghan Maguire, Francesco Castellani, Ludovico Terzi, Simon-Philippe Breton, Yuko Ueda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus Citations

Abstract

Researchers within the International Energy Agency (IEA) Task 31: Wakebench have created a framework for the evaluation of wind farm flow models operating at the microscale level. The framework consists of a model evaluation protocol integrated with a web-based portal for model benchmarking (www.windbench.net). This paper provides an overview of the building-block validation approach applied to wind farm wake models, including best practices for the benchmarking and data processing procedures for validation datasets from wind farm SCADA and meteorological databases. A hierarchy of test cases has been proposed for wake model evaluation, from similarity theory of the axisymmetric wake and idealized infinite wind farm, to single-wake wind tunnel (UMN-EPFL) and field experiments (Sexbierum), to wind farm arrays in offshore (Horns Rev, Lillgrund) and complex terrain conditions (San Gregorio). A summary of results from the axisymmetric wake, Sexbierum, Horns Rev and Lillgrund benchmarks are used to discuss the state-of-the-art of wake model validation and highlight the most relevant issues for future development.

Original languageAmerican English
Article number012185
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume524
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Event5th Science of Making Torque from Wind Conference, TORQUE 2014 - Copenhagen, Denmark
Duration: 18 Jun 201420 Jun 2014

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/JA-5000-62477

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'IEA-Task 31 WAKEBENCH: Towards a Protocol for Wind Farm Flow Model Evaluation. Part 2: Wind Farm Wake Models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this