TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine Learning Benchmarks for the Classification of Equivalent Circuit Models from Electrochemical Impedance Spectra
T2 - Article No. 060512
AU - Schaeffer, Joachim
AU - Gasper, Paul
AU - Garcia-Tamayo, Esteban
AU - Gasper, Raymond
AU - Adachi, Masaki
AU - Gaviria-Cardona, Juan Pablo
AU - Montoya-Bedoya, Simon
AU - Bhutani, Anoushka
AU - Schiek, Andrew
AU - Goodall, Rhys
AU - Findelsen, Rolf
AU - Braatz, Richard
AU - Engelke, Simon
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Analysis of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) data for electrochemical systems often consists of defining an Equivalent Circuit Model (ECM) using expert knowledge and then optimizing the model parameters to deconvolute various resistance, capacitive, inductive, or diffusion responses. For small data sets, this procedure can be conducted manually; however, it is not feasible to manually define a proper ECM for extensive data sets with a wide range of EIS responses. Automatic identification of an ECM would substantially accelerate the analysis of large sets of EIS data. We showcase machine learning methods to classify the ECMs of 9,300 impedance spectra provided by QuantumScape for the BatteryDEV hackathon. The best-performing approach is a gradient-boosted tree model utilizing a library to automatically generate features, followed by a random forest model using the raw spectral data. A convolutional neural network using boolean images of Nyquist representations is presented as an alternative, although it achieves a lower accuracy. We publish the data and open source the associated code. The approaches described in this article can serve as benchmarks for further studies. A key remaining challenge is the identifiability of the labels, underlined by the model performances and the comparison of misclassified spectra.
AB - Analysis of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) data for electrochemical systems often consists of defining an Equivalent Circuit Model (ECM) using expert knowledge and then optimizing the model parameters to deconvolute various resistance, capacitive, inductive, or diffusion responses. For small data sets, this procedure can be conducted manually; however, it is not feasible to manually define a proper ECM for extensive data sets with a wide range of EIS responses. Automatic identification of an ECM would substantially accelerate the analysis of large sets of EIS data. We showcase machine learning methods to classify the ECMs of 9,300 impedance spectra provided by QuantumScape for the BatteryDEV hackathon. The best-performing approach is a gradient-boosted tree model utilizing a library to automatically generate features, followed by a random forest model using the raw spectral data. A convolutional neural network using boolean images of Nyquist representations is presented as an alternative, although it achieves a lower accuracy. We publish the data and open source the associated code. The approaches described in this article can serve as benchmarks for further studies. A key remaining challenge is the identifiability of the labels, underlined by the model performances and the comparison of misclassified spectra.
KW - classification
KW - electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
KW - equivalent circuit model
KW - hackathon
KW - lithium-ion batteries
KW - machine learning
KW - open data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163347980&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1149/1945-7111/acd8fb
DO - 10.1149/1945-7111/acd8fb
M3 - Article
SN - 0013-4651
VL - 170
JO - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
JF - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
IS - 6
ER -