TY - JOUR
T1 - Microstructure Scale Lithium-Ion Battery Modeling, Part IV: The Representativity of Microstructure Parameters and Electrochemical Response
AU - Usseglio-Viretta, Francois
AU - Colclasure, Andrew
AU - Allen, Jeffery
AU - Weddle, Peter
AU - Finegan, Donal
AU - Graf, Peter
AU - Smith, Kandler
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Lithium-ion battery electrochemical models require an accurate description of the electrodes microstructures to be predictive, that can be achieved through nanoscale imaging. Such observations are however limited by their field of view (FOV), as they provide only a subset of the whole electrode volume that does not necessarily represent the whole electrode microstructure heterogeneity, and therefore can bias the analysis. A representativity analysis has been performed on the microstructure parameters and, in a novel way, on the full cell electrochemical response to evaluate the predictions representativeness, and thus relevance, of a microstructure scale electrochemical model. The microstructure parameter deviation propagations to the electrochemical response have been quantified for different charge rates. This defines a threshold for the microstructure parameters FOV for a desired maximum deviation of the electrochemical response. Electrochemical model shows cell representative section areas are increasing with C-rate, due to higher in-plane heterogeneities, indicating larger FOVs are required specifically for fast charge modeling. Representativity analysis determines a cell FOV of 144.4 x 154.4 ..mu..m2 is large enough to establish a convergence on the representative section areas for low-intermediate C-rate (<=2.5 C), therefore positively concludes on the model representativeness for these rates, but is not large enough to conclude for higher rates.
AB - Lithium-ion battery electrochemical models require an accurate description of the electrodes microstructures to be predictive, that can be achieved through nanoscale imaging. Such observations are however limited by their field of view (FOV), as they provide only a subset of the whole electrode volume that does not necessarily represent the whole electrode microstructure heterogeneity, and therefore can bias the analysis. A representativity analysis has been performed on the microstructure parameters and, in a novel way, on the full cell electrochemical response to evaluate the predictions representativeness, and thus relevance, of a microstructure scale electrochemical model. The microstructure parameter deviation propagations to the electrochemical response have been quantified for different charge rates. This defines a threshold for the microstructure parameters FOV for a desired maximum deviation of the electrochemical response. Electrochemical model shows cell representative section areas are increasing with C-rate, due to higher in-plane heterogeneities, indicating larger FOVs are required specifically for fast charge modeling. Representativity analysis determines a cell FOV of 144.4 x 154.4 ..mu..m2 is large enough to establish a convergence on the representative section areas for low-intermediate C-rate (<=2.5 C), therefore positively concludes on the model representativeness for these rates, but is not large enough to conclude for higher rates.
KW - electrochemical models
KW - lithium-ion batteries
KW - performance
U2 - 10.1149/1945-7111/adee50
DO - 10.1149/1945-7111/adee50
M3 - Article
SN - 0013-4651
VL - 172
JO - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
JF - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
IS - 7
ER -