Abstract
Given the difficulty and the time pressure of solving unit commitment problems, near-optimal solutions (those with 0.1 or 0.001% optimality gaps) are often used in practice. The choice in which of the near-optimal solutions is used, however, is random. We investigate the impact of solution choice on the revenues obtained by generator owners across a variety of pricing schemes and problem instances.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Electric Power Systems Research |
Volume | 234 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2024 |
NREL Publication Number
- NREL/JA-2C00-90475
Keywords
- market-clearing
- mixed-integer linear programming (MILP)
- symmetry
- unit commitment (UC)