TY - JOUR
T1 - Opportunities for Treatment and Reuse of Agricultural Drainage in the United States
AU - Hejase, Charifa
AU - Weitzel, Katelin
AU - Stokes, Sean
AU - Grauberger, Brandi
AU - Young, Robert
AU - Arias-Paic, Miguel
AU - Kong, Minghao
AU - Chae, Soryong
AU - Bandhauer, Todd
AU - Tong, Tiezheng
AU - Herber, Daniel
AU - Stout, Sherry
AU - Miara, Ariel
AU - Huang, Zhe
AU - Evans, Anna
AU - Kurup, Parthiv
AU - Talmadge, Michael
AU - Kandt, Alicen
AU - Stokes-Draut, Jennifer
AU - Macknick, Jordan
AU - Borch, Thomas
AU - Dionysiou, Dionysios
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Irrigation accounts for 42% of the total freshwater withdrawals in the United States. Climate change, the pressure of a growing population, degrading water quality, and increased competition from other sectors could constrain continuous supply to meet future agricultural water demand. This study presents an evaluation framework to assess the potential reuse of agricultural drainage water for crop irrigation. Using a regional approach, we review the current state of agricultural drainage treatment and reuse and the institutional, economic, and other barriers that can influence the reuse decision. In the 31 eastern states, agricultural drainage contains valuable nutrients that can be reused for irrigation with minimal treatment, while the 17 western states struggle with large volumes of saline drainage that can contain constituents of concern (e.g., selenium), preventing reuse without treatment. Using a new decision-support tool called WaterTAP3, a potential treatment train for saline agricultural drainage was analyzed to identify treatment challenges, research needs, and the potential implementation at a larger scale. As demonstrated by our case study, desalination of agricultural drainage is costly and energy intensive and will require sizable investments to fully develop and optimize technologies as well as manage the generated waste and brine.
AB - Irrigation accounts for 42% of the total freshwater withdrawals in the United States. Climate change, the pressure of a growing population, degrading water quality, and increased competition from other sectors could constrain continuous supply to meet future agricultural water demand. This study presents an evaluation framework to assess the potential reuse of agricultural drainage water for crop irrigation. Using a regional approach, we review the current state of agricultural drainage treatment and reuse and the institutional, economic, and other barriers that can influence the reuse decision. In the 31 eastern states, agricultural drainage contains valuable nutrients that can be reused for irrigation with minimal treatment, while the 17 western states struggle with large volumes of saline drainage that can contain constituents of concern (e.g., selenium), preventing reuse without treatment. Using a new decision-support tool called WaterTAP3, a potential treatment train for saline agricultural drainage was analyzed to identify treatment challenges, research needs, and the potential implementation at a larger scale. As demonstrated by our case study, desalination of agricultural drainage is costly and energy intensive and will require sizable investments to fully develop and optimize technologies as well as manage the generated waste and brine.
KW - Advanced Treatment
KW - Agricultural Drainage
KW - Irrigation
KW - Water Reuse
KW - WaterTAP3
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138627541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00277
DO - 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00277
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138627541
SN - 2690-0645
VL - 2
SP - 292
EP - 305
JO - ACS ES and T Engineering
JF - ACS ES and T Engineering
IS - 3
ER -