Procter & Gamble: Compressed Air System Upgrade Saves Energy and Improves Production at a Paper Mill;

Karen Atkison

Procter & Gamble: Compressed Air System Upgrade Saves Energy and Improves Production at a Paper Mill;

Karen Atkison

Research output: NLR › Brochure

Abstract

In 2002, Procter & Gamble applied a system-level strategy to optimize a compressed air system at its paper products mill in Mehoopany, Pennsylvania. The project improved production, improved system performance, and saved 7.6 million kWh per year and $309,000 per year in maintenance costs.

Original language	American English
Number of pages	4
State	Published - 2004

NLR Publication Number

NREL/BR-840-33966

Other Report Number

DOE/GO-102004-1727

Keywords

case study
compressed air
industrial energy efficiency
Mehoopany
paper products
Pennsylvania
Procter & Gamble
system-level

Access to Document

https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/33966.pdf

Cite this

@misc{661befa55b574a6aa359ebed49da694d,

title = "Procter \& Gamble: Compressed Air System Upgrade Saves Energy and Improves Production at a Paper Mill;",

abstract = "In 2002, Procter \& Gamble applied a system-level strategy to optimize a compressed air system at its paper products mill in Mehoopany, Pennsylvania. The project improved production, improved system performance, and saved 7.6 million kWh per year and \$309,000 per year in maintenance costs.",

keywords = "case study, compressed air, industrial energy efficiency, Mehoopany, paper products, Pennsylvania, Procter \& Gamble, system-level",

author = "Karen Atkison",

year = "2004",

language = "American English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Procter & Gamble: Compressed Air System Upgrade Saves Energy and Improves Production at a Paper Mill;

AU - Atkison, Karen

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - In 2002, Procter & Gamble applied a system-level strategy to optimize a compressed air system at its paper products mill in Mehoopany, Pennsylvania. The project improved production, improved system performance, and saved 7.6 million kWh per year and $309,000 per year in maintenance costs.

AB - In 2002, Procter & Gamble applied a system-level strategy to optimize a compressed air system at its paper products mill in Mehoopany, Pennsylvania. The project improved production, improved system performance, and saved 7.6 million kWh per year and $309,000 per year in maintenance costs.

KW - case study

KW - compressed air

KW - industrial energy efficiency

KW - Mehoopany

KW - paper products

KW - Pennsylvania

KW - Procter & Gamble

KW - system-level

M3 - Brochure

ER -

Procter & Gamble: Compressed Air System Upgrade Saves Energy and Improves Production at a Paper Mill;

Abstract

NLR Publication Number

Other Report Number

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this