Abstract
From an indoor air quality perspective, the best residential ventilation strategies include filtering outdoor air and distributing that air to all occupied parts of a home. From an energy standpoint, it’s desirable that energy be transferred from the exhaust air to the incoming outdoor air to limit heating and cooling impacts. Heat or energy recovery ventilation systems (HRVs or ERVs) can provide these functions, but researchers have seen many poor installations related to design, installation, and operation and maintenance. More robust ventilation systems may involve an ERV with a dedicated duct distribution system and controls. Such a duct system can be costly to install, and many builders reduce these costs by connecting an ERV to a central heating and cooling duct system. While this can sometimes be done effectively, researchers have seen consistent challenges with low, inconsistent, or imbalanced flow rates; high electricity consumption; and – of greatest concern – outdoor air short-circuiting or not being delivered to occupied spaces at all. Most ERVs are designed to operate with their own duct system; they are not designed as an add-on to much larger HVAC systems. With support from the US DOE Building Technologies Office, Steven Winter Associates, Inc. (SWA) partnered with Mitsubishi Electric Trane US, CORE Energy Recovery Solutions, and Therma-Stor LLC to design and test VICS prototypes. A conceptual diagram is shown in Figure 1, and the latest prototype (shown in Figure 2) was manufactured by Therma-Stor and tested in SWA’s facility in Norwalk, CT. The ERV heat exchanger was provided by CORE, and the VICS was installed in conjunction with a 1-ton, inverter heat pump provided by Mitsubishi.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 84 |
State | Published - 2021 |
NREL Publication Number
- NREL/TP-5500-78352
Other Report Number
- DOE/GO-102021-5491
Keywords
- Building America
- buildings
- comfort system
- ventilation