Resource Assessment for Distributed Wind Energy: An Evaluation of Best-Practice Methods in the Continental USA: Article No. 092005

Caleb Phillips, Dmitry Duplyakin, Lindsay Sheridan, Jenna Ruzekowicz, Matthew Nelson, Dimitrios Fytanidis, Rod Linn, Rao Kotamarthi, Heidi Tinnesand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Current wind resources within the United States (US) indicate a potential to profitably install nearly 1,400 gigawatts of distributed wind (DW) capacity. This amount is equivalent to over half of the United States' current energy demand from electricity, making it enough to power millions of homes and businesses and replace countless fossil fuel-based generating plants. Despite the potential growth of DW in the US, deployments are presently hindered by a lack of confidence in resource estimation methods. One potential challenge is that smaller-scale turbines, with hub heights of 40 meters or less, are disproportionately impacted by obstacles such as buildings and vegetation. These obstacles may produce complex wake effects, best modeled with high-fidelity complex fluid dynamics (CFD) models that are too computationally expensive to use for routine siting and resource assessment. Thus, installers today make use of heuristics and simple equations to approximate the impact of obstacles while also leveraging long-term resource data from commercial or publicly available atmospheric models. This study evaluates these historical and commonly used methods alongside new lower-order obstacle models produced from CFD simulations and measurement-based bias correction. The preliminary results from this study show the importance of taking care in the choice and application of mesoscale atmospheric models and the significant value of bias correction using measurements from nearby meteorological towers. Detailed obstacle modeling provides only modest additional gains in performance and, in some cases, can add error, especially at sites where turbines have already been located to avoid obvious impact from upwind obstacles. These findings reinforce the importance of collecting in situ measurements and suggest that obstacle models may be better applied in practice to automated or computer-aided siting, rather than in economic wind resource assessments.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume2767
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/JA-2C00-88588

Keywords

  • conus
  • distributed wind
  • model validation
  • obstacle modeling
  • resource assessment
  • siting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resource Assessment for Distributed Wind Energy: An Evaluation of Best-Practice Methods in the Continental USA: Article No. 092005'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this