Review and Understanding of Screen-Printed Contacts and Selective-Emitter Formation: Preprint

Bobby To

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

A comparison of the loss mechanisms in screen-printed solar cells relative to buried contact cells and cells with photolithography-defined contacts is presented in this paper. Model calculations show that emitter recombination accounts for about 0.5% absolute efficiency loss in conventional screen-printed cells with low-sheet-resistance emitters. Ohmic contact to high-sheet-resistance emitters byscreen-printing has been investigated to regain this efficiency loss. Our work shows that good quality ohmic contacts to high sheet-resistance emitters can be achieved if the glass frit chemistry and Ag particle size are carefully tailored. The melting characteristics of the glass frit determine the firing scheme suitable for low contact resistance and high fill factors. In addition, small toregular Ag particles were found to help achieve a higher open-circuit voltage and maintain a low contact resistance. This work has resulted in cells with high fill factors (0.782) on high sheet-resistance emitters and efficiencies of 17.4% on planar float zone Si substrates, without the need for a selective emitter.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages11
StatePublished - 2004
Event14th Workshop on Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells and Modules - Winter Park, Colorado
Duration: 8 Aug 200411 Aug 2004

Conference

Conference14th Workshop on Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells and Modules
CityWinter Park, Colorado
Period8/08/0411/08/04

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/CP-520-36747

Keywords

  • crystal growth
  • crystalline silicon (x-Si) (c-Si)
  • defects
  • device process
  • impurities
  • materials and processes
  • microelectronics
  • module
  • passivation
  • photovoltaics (PV)
  • PV
  • solar cells

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review and Understanding of Screen-Printed Contacts and Selective-Emitter Formation: Preprint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this