Review of Artificial Abrasion Test Methods for PV Module Technology

Research output: NRELTechnical Report

Abstract

This review is intended to identify the method or methods--and the basic details of those methods--that might be used to develop an artificial abrasion test. Methods used in the PV literature were compared with their closest implementation in existing standards. Also, meetings of the International PV Quality Assurance Task Force Task Group 12-3 (TG12-3, which is concerned with coated glass) were used to identify established test methods. Feedback from the group, which included many of the authors from the PV literature, included insights not explored within the literature itself. The combined experience and examples from the literature are intended to provide an assessment of the present industry practices and an informed path forward. Recommendations toward artificial abrasion test methods are then identified based on the experiences in the literature and feedback from the PV community. The review here is strictly focused on abrasion. Assessment methods, including optical performance (e.g., transmittance or reflectance), surface energy, and verification of chemical composition were not examined. Methods of artificially soiling PV modules or other specimens were not examined. The weathering of artificial or naturally soiled specimens (which may ultimately include combined temperature and humidity, thermal cycling and ultraviolet light) were also not examined. A sense of the purpose or application of an abrasion test method within the PV industry should, however, be evident from the literature.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages25
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/TP-5J00-66334

Keywords

  • erosion
  • tribology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of Artificial Abrasion Test Methods for PV Module Technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this