Revisiting the Activity of Two Poly(Vinyl Chloride)- and Polyethylene-Degrading Enzymes: Article No. 8501

Anton Stepnov, Esteban Lopez-Tavera, Ross Klauer, Clarissa Lincoln, Ravindra Chowreddy, Gregg Beckham, Vincent Eijsink, Kevin Solomon, Mark Blenner, Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus Citations

Abstract

Biocatalytic degradation of non-hydrolyzable plastics is a rapidly growing field of research, driven by the global accumulation of waste. Enzymes capable of cleaving the carbon-carbon bonds in synthetic polymers are highly sought-after as they may provide tools for environmentally friendly plastic recycling. Despite some reports of oxidative enzymes acting on non-hydrolyzable plastics, including polyethylene or poly(vinyl chloride), the notion that these materials are susceptible to efficient enzymatic degradation remains controversial, partly driven by a general lack of studies independently reproducing previous observations. Here, we attempt to replicate two recent studies reporting that deconstruction of polyethylene and poly(vinyl chloride) can be achieved using an insect hexamerin from Galleria mellonella (so-called “Ceres”) or a bacterial catalase-peroxidase from Klebsiella sp., respectively. Reproducing previously described experiments, we do not observe any activity on plastics using multiple reaction conditions and multiple substrate types. Digging deeper into the discrepancies between the previous data and our observations, we show how and why the original experimental results may have been misinterpreted.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages15
JournalNature Communications
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/JA-2A00-89473

Keywords

  • biocatalytic degradation
  • carbon-carbon bonds in synthetic polymers
  • enzymatic deconstruction of polyethylene

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting the Activity of Two Poly(Vinyl Chloride)- and Polyethylene-Degrading Enzymes: Article No. 8501'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this