TY - JOUR
T1 - Soiling, Cleaning, and Abrasion: The Results of the 5-Year Photovoltaic Glass Coating Field Study
T2 - Article No. 113035
AU - Bomber, Joanna
AU - Einhorn, Asher
AU - Engtrakul, Chaiwat
AU - Lanaghan, Clare
AU - Linger, Jeffrey
AU - Micheli, Leonardo
AU - Miller, David
AU - Morse, Joshua
AU - Moutinho, Helio
AU - Muller, Matthew
AU - Newkirk, Jimmy
AU - Simpson, Lin
AU - To, Bobby
AU - Toth, Sarah
AU - Curtis, Telia
AU - Li, Fang
AU - Tamizhmani, Govindasamy
AU - Tatapudi, Sai
AU - Alberts, Vivian
AU - Al Nuaimi, Aaesha
AU - Banda, Pedro
AU - John, Jim
AU - Mathiak, Gerhard
AU - Safieh, Ahmad
AU - Stefancich, Marco
AU - Alabdulrazzaq, Bader
AU - Al-Qattan, Ayman
AU - Bhaduri, Sonali
AU - Kottantharayil, Anil
AU - Bourne, Ben
AU - deFreitas, Zoe
AU - Farina, Fabrizio
AU - Kimball, Greg
AU - Hoffman, Adam
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - External contamination ("soiling") of the incident surface is a major limiting factor for solar technologies. A 5-year field glass coupon study was conducted to better understand external contamination and its effects; compare cleaning methods and the use of preventative coatings; and explore the abrasion resulting from cleaning to advise on accelerated abrasion testing. Test sites included the cities of Dubai (UAE), Kuwait City (Kuwait), Mesa (AZ), Mumbai (India), and Sacramento (CA). Through the 5-year cumulative study, dry brush, water spray, and wet sponge and squeegee cleaning methods were compared to no cleaning. Optical microscopy was used to obtain images, including representative color images, grayscale images for object analysis, and oblique images for coating integrity assessment. A thresholding protocol was developed to analyze and distinguish specimens using the ImageJ software. Optical performance was quantified using a spectrophotometer, including comprehensive optical characterization (transmittance, reflectance, and absorptance in addition to forward- and back-scattering). Atomic force microscopy was used to verify the abrasion damage morphology, including the width and depth of surface scratches. Analysis of the results included correlation of optical performance and particle area coverage, rank order (by coating or location), and the acceleration factor for abrasion damage. The efficacy of external cleaning was more readily distinguished from the effectiveness of antisoiling coatings. The acceleration factor for dry brush cleaning of a porous silica coating was found to be on the order of unity.
AB - External contamination ("soiling") of the incident surface is a major limiting factor for solar technologies. A 5-year field glass coupon study was conducted to better understand external contamination and its effects; compare cleaning methods and the use of preventative coatings; and explore the abrasion resulting from cleaning to advise on accelerated abrasion testing. Test sites included the cities of Dubai (UAE), Kuwait City (Kuwait), Mesa (AZ), Mumbai (India), and Sacramento (CA). Through the 5-year cumulative study, dry brush, water spray, and wet sponge and squeegee cleaning methods were compared to no cleaning. Optical microscopy was used to obtain images, including representative color images, grayscale images for object analysis, and oblique images for coating integrity assessment. A thresholding protocol was developed to analyze and distinguish specimens using the ImageJ software. Optical performance was quantified using a spectrophotometer, including comprehensive optical characterization (transmittance, reflectance, and absorptance in addition to forward- and back-scattering). Atomic force microscopy was used to verify the abrasion damage morphology, including the width and depth of surface scratches. Analysis of the results included correlation of optical performance and particle area coverage, rank order (by coating or location), and the acceleration factor for abrasion damage. The efficacy of external cleaning was more readily distinguished from the effectiveness of antisoiling coatings. The acceleration factor for dry brush cleaning of a porous silica coating was found to be on the order of unity.
KW - antireflective (AR) coating
KW - antisoiling (AS) coating
KW - atomic force microscopy (AFM)
KW - cleaning
KW - contamination density
KW - durability
KW - ImageJ
KW - optical performance
KW - particulate matter
KW - PV Quality Assurance Task Force (PVQAT)
KW - soiling
KW - surface abrasion
KW - surface coverage
U2 - 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113035
DO - 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113035
M3 - Article
SN - 0927-0248
VL - 275
JO - Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
JF - Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
ER -