Stability of Cu(InxGa1-x)Se2 Solar Cells Utilizing RbF Postdeposition Treatment under a Sulfur Atmosphere: Article No. 2300052

Jake Wands, Alexandra Bothwell, Polyxeni Tsoulka, Thomas Lepetit, Nicolas Barreau, Angus Rockett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Alkali halide postdeposition treatments (PDTs) have become a key tool to maximize efficiency in Cu(InxGa1-x)Se2 (CIGS) photovoltaics. RbF PDTs have emerged as an alternative to the more common Na- and K-based techniques. This study utilizes temperature-dependent current-voltage (JVT) measurements to study a unique RbF PDT performed in a S atmosphere. The samples are measured before and after 6 months in a desiccator to study device stability. Both samples contain Na and K which diffuse from the soda-lime glass substrate. A reference sample and a RbF + S PDT sample both show the development of a rear contact barrier after aging. The contact barrier is higher for the RbF + S PDT sample, leading to decreased current in forward bias. Series resistance is also higher in the RbF + S PDT device which leads to lower fill factor. However, after aging the reference sample has a larger decrease in open-circuit voltage (VOC). Ideality factor measurements suggest Shockley-Read-Hall recombination dominates both samples. VOC versus temperature and a temperature-dependent activation energy model are used to calculate diode activation energies for each sample condition. Both techniques produce similar values that indicate recombination primarily occurs within the bulk absorber.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages6
JournalAdvanced Energy and Sustainability Research
Volume4
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/JA-5900-85944

Keywords

  • characterization
  • Cu(InxGa1-x)Se2 (CIGS)
  • recombination
  • thin film photovoltaics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stability of Cu(InxGa1-x)Se2 Solar Cells Utilizing RbF Postdeposition Treatment under a Sulfur Atmosphere: Article No. 2300052'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this