Supply Chain Sustainability Analysis of Renewable Hydrocarbon Fuels via Indirect Liquefaction, Fast Pyrolysis, and Hydrothermal Liquefaction: Update of the 2016 State-of-Technology Cases and Design Cases

Mary Biddy, Eric Tan, Ryan Davis, Michael Talmadge, Hao Cai, Jennifer Dunn, Ambica Pegallapati, Qianfeng Li, Christina Canter, Damon Hartley, David Thompson, Pimphan Meyer, Yunhua Zhu, Lesley Snowden-Swan, Susanne Jones

Research output: NRELTechnical Report

Abstract

This technical memorandum describes the supply chain sustainability analyses (SCSA) for the production of three renewable hydrocarbon transportation fuels: (1) renewable high octane gasoline (HOG) via indirect liquefaction (IDL) of woody lignocellulosic biomass; (2) renewable gasoline (RG) via fast pyrolysis of woody lignocellulosic biomass; and (3) renewable diesel via hydrothermal liquefaction of algae. This technical memorandum focuses on the 2016 State of Technology (SOT) technical, economic, and environmental performance of these three fuel production pathways, as well as the 2016 SOT woody feedstock blend production and the 2016 SOT for algae feedstock production. The results of these renewable hydrocarbon fuel pathways in these SCSA analyses update those for the respective 2015 SOT cases (Cai et al., 2016; Adom et al., 2016; Frank et al., 2016), and provide an opportunity to examine the impact of technology improvements of both biomass feedstock production and biofuel production that have been achieved since the 2015 SOTs on the sustainability performance of these renewable transportation fuels. Furthermore, they reflect updates to Argonne National Laboratory's Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation (GREET[R]) model, which was released in October 2016 (ANL, 2016). The 2015 SOT case was re-evaluated using this newly-released version, which includes updates to the production of natural gas, electricity, and liquid fuels that can influence biofuels' supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) (CO2, CH4, and N2O) emissions. These emissions and water consumption are the two sustainability metrics assessed in this analysis. The design cases (future target projections) for these three fuel production pathways were also re-evaluated using GREET 2016. In particular, the 2016 woody blend feedstock SOT was used in lieu of the previous design case woody blend feedstock, which utilized construction and demolition waste (INL, 2014). In the 2016 woody blend feedstock SOT, the construction and demolition waste was eliminated due to a lack of Renewable Identification Number (RINs) generation, and replaced with short rotation hybrid poplar in order to align with the woody feedstock blend that was chosen by the BETO Feedstock-Conversion Interface Consortium (FCIC) for the 2017 fast pyrolysis verification.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages38
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

NREL Publication Number

  • NREL/TP-5100-68036

Other Report Number

  • INL/EXT-17-41319; ANL-17/04

Keywords

  • algae
  • fast pyrolysis
  • hydrothermal liquefaction
  • indirect liquefaction
  • renewable diesel
  • renewable gasoline
  • renewable high octane gasoline
  • renewable hydrocarbon transportation fuels
  • TEA
  • techno-economic analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Supply Chain Sustainability Analysis of Renewable Hydrocarbon Fuels via Indirect Liquefaction, Fast Pyrolysis, and Hydrothermal Liquefaction: Update of the 2016 State-of-Technology Cases and Design Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this