Techno-Economic Case Study: Low-Temperature Conversion Performance Based on Isolated Anatomical Fractions of Corn Stover: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)

This report summarizes analysis conducted to support a case study under the Feedstock-Conversion Interface Consortium (FCIC) focused on techno-economic analysis (TEA) modeling to quantify the yield and cost ramifications for processing isolated anatomical fractions of corn stover through a low-temperature conversion (biochemical pathway) biorefinery. It is hypothesized that different individual anatomical fractions of corn stover vary in composition and recalcitrance, such that processing each fraction on its own e.g. through dedicated campaigns may enable economic benefits relative to processing the whole stover material. To investigate this concept, we worked with FCIC researchers to obtain data on compositional analysis, as well as processing conditions and yields, for conversion of whole corn stover plus three individual anatomical fractions (cobs, husks, and stalks) across key steps of the biorefinery conversion process within FCIC research scope, namely pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. After running the data through the TEA models, fractionated cobs and husks achieved higher fuel yields and lower minimum fuel selling prices than whole corn stover, but stalks fared worse than whole stover on both metrics. The most direct takeaway from this assessment is that a biorefinery would stand to benefit economically from maximizing the use of cob and husk fractions while avoiding or minimizing the use of stalks, though recognizing practical constraints with this approach in maintaining an equivalent processing capacity (fixed at 2,000 dry metric tonne per day in all cases).