TY - JOUR
T1 - The ASHRAE Great Energy Predictor III Competition: Overview and Results
AU - Miller, Clayton
AU - Arjunan, Pandarasamy
AU - Kathirgamanathan, Anjukan
AU - Fu, Chun
AU - Roth, Jonathan
AU - Park, June
AU - Balbach, Chris
AU - Gowri, Krishnan
AU - Nagy, Zoltan
AU - Fontanini, Anthony
AU - Haberl, Jeff
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 ASHRAE.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In late 2019, ASHRAE hosted the Great Energy Predictor III (GEPIII) machine learning competition on the Kaggle platform. This launch marked the third energy prediction competition from ASHRAE and the first since the mid-1990s. In this updated version, the competitors were provided with over 20 million points of training data from 2,380 energy meters collected for 1,448 buildings from 16 sources. This competition’s overall objective was to find the most accurate modeling solutions for the prediction of over 41 million private and public test data points. The competition had 4,370 participants, split across 3,614 teams from 94 countries who submitted 39,403 predictions. In addition to the top five winning workflows, the competitors publicly shared 415 reproducible online machine learning workflow examples (notebooks), including over 40 additional, full solutions. This paper gives a high-level overview of the competition preparation and dataset, competitors and their discussions, machine learning workflows and models generated, winners and their submissions, discussion of lessons learned, and competition outputs and next steps. The most popular and accurate machine learning workflows used large ensembles of mostly gradient boosting tree models, such as LightGBM. Similar to the first predictor competition, preprocessing of the data sets emerged as a key differentiator.
AB - In late 2019, ASHRAE hosted the Great Energy Predictor III (GEPIII) machine learning competition on the Kaggle platform. This launch marked the third energy prediction competition from ASHRAE and the first since the mid-1990s. In this updated version, the competitors were provided with over 20 million points of training data from 2,380 energy meters collected for 1,448 buildings from 16 sources. This competition’s overall objective was to find the most accurate modeling solutions for the prediction of over 41 million private and public test data points. The competition had 4,370 participants, split across 3,614 teams from 94 countries who submitted 39,403 predictions. In addition to the top five winning workflows, the competitors publicly shared 415 reproducible online machine learning workflow examples (notebooks), including over 40 additional, full solutions. This paper gives a high-level overview of the competition preparation and dataset, competitors and their discussions, machine learning workflows and models generated, winners and their submissions, discussion of lessons learned, and competition outputs and next steps. The most popular and accurate machine learning workflows used large ensembles of mostly gradient boosting tree models, such as LightGBM. Similar to the first predictor competition, preprocessing of the data sets emerged as a key differentiator.
KW - ASHRAE
KW - building energy model
KW - buildings
KW - machine learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089745869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23744731.2020.1795514
DO - 10.1080/23744731.2020.1795514
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089745869
SN - 2374-4731
VL - 26
SP - 1427
EP - 1447
JO - Science and Technology for the Built Environment
JF - Science and Technology for the Built Environment
IS - 10
ER -