TY - JOUR
T1 - The Need for and Path to Harmonized Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Assessment for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Utilization
AU - Schaidle, Joshua
AU - Tao, Ling
AU - Sick, Volker
AU - Armstrong, Katy
AU - Cooney, Gregory
AU - Cremonese, Lorenzo
AU - Eggleston, Alexandra
AU - Faber, Grant
AU - Hackett, Gregory
AU - Katelhon, Arne
AU - Keoleian, Greg
AU - Marano, John
AU - Marriott, Joseph
AU - McCord, Stephen
AU - Miller, Shelie
AU - Mutchek, Michele
AU - Olfe-Krautlein, Barbara
AU - Ravikumar, Dwarakanath
AU - Roper, Louise
AU - Skone, Timothy
AU - Smith, Lorraine
AU - Strunge, Till
AU - Styring, Peter
AU - Volker, Simon
AU - Zimmermann, Arno
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The use of carbon dioxide as a feedstock for a broad range of products can help mitigate the effects of climate change through long-term removal of carbon or as part of a circular carbon economy. Research on capture and conversion technologies has intensified in recent years, and the interest in deploying these technologies is growing fast. However, sound understanding of the environmental and economic impacts of these technologies is required to drive fast deployment and avoid unintended consequences. Life cycle assessments (LCAs) and techno-economic assessments (TEAs) are useful tools to quantify environmental and economic metrics; however, these tools can be very flexible in how they are applied, with the potential to produce significantly different results depending on how the boundaries and assumptions are defined. Built on ISO standards for generic LCAs, several guidance documents have emerged recently from the Global CO2 Initiative, the National Energy Technology Laboratory, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory that further define assessment specifications for carbon capture and utilization. Overall agreement in the approaches is noted with differences largely based on the intended use cases. However, further guidance is needed for assessments of early-stage technologies, reporting details, and reporting for policymakers and nontechnical decision-makers.
AB - The use of carbon dioxide as a feedstock for a broad range of products can help mitigate the effects of climate change through long-term removal of carbon or as part of a circular carbon economy. Research on capture and conversion technologies has intensified in recent years, and the interest in deploying these technologies is growing fast. However, sound understanding of the environmental and economic impacts of these technologies is required to drive fast deployment and avoid unintended consequences. Life cycle assessments (LCAs) and techno-economic assessments (TEAs) are useful tools to quantify environmental and economic metrics; however, these tools can be very flexible in how they are applied, with the potential to produce significantly different results depending on how the boundaries and assumptions are defined. Built on ISO standards for generic LCAs, several guidance documents have emerged recently from the Global CO2 Initiative, the National Energy Technology Laboratory, and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory that further define assessment specifications for carbon capture and utilization. Overall agreement in the approaches is noted with differences largely based on the intended use cases. However, further guidance is needed for assessments of early-stage technologies, reporting details, and reporting for policymakers and nontechnical decision-makers.
KW - carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage
KW - carbon recycling
KW - greenhouse gas mitigations
KW - life cycle assessments
KW - techno-economic assessments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074847461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ente.201901034
DO - 10.1002/ente.201901034
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074847461
SN - 2194-4288
VL - 8
JO - Energy Technology
JF - Energy Technology
IS - 11
M1 - 1901034
ER -