TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a Sustainable Circular Economy of Multilayer Plastic Films: Life Cycle and Techno-Economic Assessment with a Focus on End-Of-Life Treatment and Multiple Recovery Cycles
T2 - Article No. e01526
AU - Nazemi, Farshid
AU - Hanes, Rebecca
AU - Mulyana, Rachmat
AU - Castro, Jose
AU - Mukkamala, Saikrishna
AU - Hyche, Todd
AU - Bakshi, Bhavik
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) of end-of-life technologies for treating polyethylene-polyamide barrier film waste, focusing on quality degradation across recovery cycles. Novel treatment methods are experimentally validated, while others are drawn from literature and industry consultations. A displacement approach, assuming no quality loss, is first applied. Results show that solvent-based recycling via the solvent-targeted recovery and precipitation (STRAP) process outperforms alternatives across environmental indicators, reducing global warming potential (GWP) by 40% compared to landfilling. Incineration performs worst in most categories, particularly eutrophication (80% higher than landfilling), due to nitrogen emissions. Experimentally validated downcycling (pelletizing) proves more economically viable. The assumption of infinite recoverability is overly optimistic. To address this, we propose a mathematical framework accounting for a finite number of recovery cycles. This refined model shows reduced GWP and cost savings for solvent recovery, making its benefits less pronounced than initially estimated. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses reveal strong dependence on recovered material quality and solvent recovery efficiency, underscoring the need for optimized process design. Finally, hotspot analysis identifies greenhouse gas emissions from the polyamide supply chain as the dominant GWP contributor. The results underscore potential trade-offs across pathways and show that solvent-based recovery's sustainability depends heavily on process conditions.
AB - This study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) of end-of-life technologies for treating polyethylene-polyamide barrier film waste, focusing on quality degradation across recovery cycles. Novel treatment methods are experimentally validated, while others are drawn from literature and industry consultations. A displacement approach, assuming no quality loss, is first applied. Results show that solvent-based recycling via the solvent-targeted recovery and precipitation (STRAP) process outperforms alternatives across environmental indicators, reducing global warming potential (GWP) by 40% compared to landfilling. Incineration performs worst in most categories, particularly eutrophication (80% higher than landfilling), due to nitrogen emissions. Experimentally validated downcycling (pelletizing) proves more economically viable. The assumption of infinite recoverability is overly optimistic. To address this, we propose a mathematical framework accounting for a finite number of recovery cycles. This refined model shows reduced GWP and cost savings for solvent recovery, making its benefits less pronounced than initially estimated. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses reveal strong dependence on recovered material quality and solvent recovery efficiency, underscoring the need for optimized process design. Finally, hotspot analysis identifies greenhouse gas emissions from the polyamide supply chain as the dominant GWP contributor. The results underscore potential trade-offs across pathways and show that solvent-based recovery's sustainability depends heavily on process conditions.
KW - circular economy
KW - life cycle assessment
KW - Monte Carlo simulation
KW - multilayer film
KW - plastic waste
KW - techno-economic analysis
U2 - 10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01526
DO - 10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01526
M3 - Article
SN - 2214-9937
VL - 45
JO - Sustainable Materials and Technologies
JF - Sustainable Materials and Technologies
ER -