@misc{96648a8ba8ba4eceb6f9be4cb5758b7e,
title = "Ultimate Bifacial Showdown: 75kW Field Results",
abstract = "This work presents one year results for a side-by-side comparison of 5 different bifacial technologies, deployed in a 75-kW single-axis tracked field at Golden, CO. Four PERC (multi and mono) and 1 Silicon Heterojunction manufacturers are represented. Reference strings of equivalent monofacial PV modules are also installed for a direct technology comparison and calculation of bifacial gain. Analysis indicates performance within expectation, with a cumulative model mean error within +/- 2% for both bifacial and monofacial models and cumulative bifacial energy gain between 6-9%. High accuracy string-level DC monitoring and module-level measurements are also presented, showing effects of snow and edge effects in the order of +/- 3% for non-uniform irradiance across the row. Data from a custom-module to measure shading loss from the torque-tube is installed, showing up to 6% irradiance non-uniformity for the month of January.",
keywords = "bifacial field validation, bifacial PV, due diligence software, open source PV modeling, ray tracing, view factor models",
author = "Silvana Pelaez and Chris Deline and Bill Marion and Bill Sekulic and Byron McDanold and Joshua Parker and Mark Monarch and Joshua Stein",
year = "2020",
language = "American English",
series = "Presented at the Bifacial PV Workshop 2020, 27-28 July 2020",
type = "Other",
}