TY - JOUR
T1 - Winds of Fortune? Understanding the Geographic, Sociodemographic, and Temporal Distribution of Benefit Mechanisms from Land-Based Wind Projects in the United States
T2 - Article No. 104437
AU - Kreider, Matilda
AU - Brush, Chloe
AU - Iyer, Shweta
AU - Talamo, Julia
AU - Casey, Alexandra
AU - Constant, Chloe
AU - MacDonald, Suzanne
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Despite decades of research on factors shaping local responses to wind development, there is relatively little known about benefit mechanisms (e.g., agreements, funds, donations) used by developers in the U.S. land-based wind sector. To address this gap, we collected benefit mechanism data across all current utility-scale land-based wind projects installed between 1982 and 2024 (n = 1047), finding that just under one-third of projects had a benefit mechanism attached to them. We find the use of benefit mechanisms has become more common over time, is associated with larger projects, and varies by region. In terms of host community characteristics, the use of benefit mechanisms is associated with characteristics like higher education level, higher percent white, higher percent Republican, higher decision-making capacity, lower unemployment rate, and higher poverty rate. Building on a theoretical framework of purposes, we discuss what these findings could suggest about the motivations driving developers' use of these mechanisms, such as increasing local acceptance of a wind project or supporting distributive fairness. This first-of-its-kind study builds a comprehensive understanding of how benefit mechanisms have been used in the U.S. wind industry throughout its history, which can inform future approaches to benefit-sharing across sectors.
AB - Despite decades of research on factors shaping local responses to wind development, there is relatively little known about benefit mechanisms (e.g., agreements, funds, donations) used by developers in the U.S. land-based wind sector. To address this gap, we collected benefit mechanism data across all current utility-scale land-based wind projects installed between 1982 and 2024 (n = 1047), finding that just under one-third of projects had a benefit mechanism attached to them. We find the use of benefit mechanisms has become more common over time, is associated with larger projects, and varies by region. In terms of host community characteristics, the use of benefit mechanisms is associated with characteristics like higher education level, higher percent white, higher percent Republican, higher decision-making capacity, lower unemployment rate, and higher poverty rate. Building on a theoretical framework of purposes, we discuss what these findings could suggest about the motivations driving developers' use of these mechanisms, such as increasing local acceptance of a wind project or supporting distributive fairness. This first-of-its-kind study builds a comprehensive understanding of how benefit mechanisms have been used in the U.S. wind industry throughout its history, which can inform future approaches to benefit-sharing across sectors.
KW - benefit mechanism
KW - community benefits
KW - compensation
KW - distributive fairness
KW - social acceptance
KW - wind energy
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104437
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104437
M3 - Article
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 130
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
ER -