TY - GEN
T1 - Workshop Report on Methods for R&D Portfolio Analysis and Evaluation
AU - Bush, Brian
AU - Hanes, Rebecca
AU - Hunter, Chad
AU - Hughes, Caroline
AU - Mann, Margaret
AU - Newes, Emily
AU - Baldwin, Sam
AU - Baker, Erin
AU - Clarke, Leon
AU - Gabriel, Steve
AU - Henrion, Max
AU - Klemun, Magdalena
AU - Marangoni, Giacomo
AU - Nemet, Gregory
AU - Newman, Alexandra
AU - Paich, Mark
AU - Popper, Steven
AU - Way, Rupert
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The Workshop on Methods for R&D Portfolio Analysis and Evaluation convened on 17–18 July 2019 at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado, and examined strengths and weaknesses of the various methodologies applicable to R&D portfolio modeling, analysis, and decision support, given pragmatic constraints such as data availability, uncertainties in estimating the impact of R&D spending, and practical operational overheads. Participants employed their deep expertise in approaches such as stochastic optimization, real options, Monte-Carlo analysis, Bayesian networks, decision theory, complex systems analysis, deep uncertainty, and technology-evolution modeling to critique the initial example models developed by the project’s core team and to conduct thought experiments grounded in real-life technology models, progress data, expert elicitation, and portfolio information. This engagement of participants’ methodological expertise with the practical requirements of real-life portfolio decision support yielded ideas for improved approaches, alternative methodological hypotheses, and hybridization of methodologies that are well-grounded theoretically, computationally sound, and realistically executable given data availability and other practical constraints.
AB - The Workshop on Methods for R&D Portfolio Analysis and Evaluation convened on 17–18 July 2019 at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado, and examined strengths and weaknesses of the various methodologies applicable to R&D portfolio modeling, analysis, and decision support, given pragmatic constraints such as data availability, uncertainties in estimating the impact of R&D spending, and practical operational overheads. Participants employed their deep expertise in approaches such as stochastic optimization, real options, Monte-Carlo analysis, Bayesian networks, decision theory, complex systems analysis, deep uncertainty, and technology-evolution modeling to critique the initial example models developed by the project’s core team and to conduct thought experiments grounded in real-life technology models, progress data, expert elicitation, and portfolio information. This engagement of participants’ methodological expertise with the practical requirements of real-life portfolio decision support yielded ideas for improved approaches, alternative methodological hypotheses, and hybridization of methodologies that are well-grounded theoretically, computationally sound, and realistically executable given data availability and other practical constraints.
KW - expert elicitation
KW - portfolio analysis
KW - stochastic optimization
KW - technology modeling
U2 - 10.2172/1660216
DO - 10.2172/1660216
M3 - Technical Report
ER -