Workshop Report on Methods for R&D Portfolio Analysis and Evaluation

  • Brian Bush
  • , Rebecca Hanes
  • , Chad Hunter
  • , Caroline Hughes
  • , Margaret Mann
  • , Emily Newes
  • , Sam Baldwin
  • , Erin Baker
  • , Leon Clarke
  • , Steve Gabriel
  • , Max Henrion
  • , Magdalena Klemun
  • , Giacomo Marangoni
  • , Gregory Nemet
  • , Alexandra Newman
  • , Mark Paich
  • , Steven Popper
  • , Rupert Way

Research output: NLRTechnical Report

Abstract

The Workshop on Methods for R&D Portfolio Analysis and Evaluation convened on 17–18 July 2019 at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado, and examined strengths and weaknesses of the various methodologies applicable to R&D portfolio modeling, analysis, and decision support, given pragmatic constraints such as data availability, uncertainties in estimating the impact of R&D spending, and practical operational overheads. Participants employed their deep expertise in approaches such as stochastic optimization, real options, Monte-Carlo analysis, Bayesian networks, decision theory, complex systems analysis, deep uncertainty, and technology-evolution modeling to critique the initial example models developed by the project’s core team and to conduct thought experiments grounded in real-life technology models, progress data, expert elicitation, and portfolio information. This engagement of participants’ methodological expertise with the practical requirements of real-life portfolio decision support yielded ideas for improved approaches, alternative methodological hypotheses, and hybridization of methodologies that are well-grounded theoretically, computationally sound, and realistically executable given data availability and other practical constraints.
Original languageAmerican English
Number of pages129
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

NLR Publication Number

  • NREL/TP-6A20-75314

Keywords

  • expert elicitation
  • portfolio analysis
  • stochastic optimization
  • technology modeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Workshop Report on Methods for R&D Portfolio Analysis and Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this