TY - JOUR
T1 - Zero Liquid Discharge and Water Reuse in Recirculating Cooling Towers at Power Facilities: Review and Case Study Analysis
AU - Plata, Sophia
AU - Devenport, Connie
AU - Miara, Ariel
AU - Sitterley, Kurban
AU - Evans, Anna
AU - Talmadge, Michael
AU - Van Allsburg, Kurt
AU - Kurup, Parthiv
AU - Cox, Jordan
AU - Kerber, Samuel
AU - Howell, Andrew
AU - Breckenridge, Richard
AU - Manygoats, Cheyenna
AU - Stokes-Draut, Jennifer
AU - Macknick, Jordan
AU - Childress, Amy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) systems installed at power facilities with the primary purpose of meeting water discharge regulations have the added benefit of providing high quality effluent that can be reused in the facility. This paper provides a review of water use in power sector recirculating cooling towers and a baseline assessment of on-site water reuse at natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power facilities. Two NGCC facilities with reverse-osmosis (RO) or brine-concentrator processes followed by evaporation ponds were selected as case studies; data from these facilities were used to quantify the water, energy, and cost implications of implementing conventional and emerging ZLD technologies. At one case study facility, model results show that implementation of ZLD would reduce water withdrawals by 18%, which is less than savings associated with implementation of dry cooling but comparable to current efforts to reduce water withdrawals by increasing cycles of concentration. Implementation of ZLD using high-recovery RO resulted in a doubling of the levelized cost of water (LCOW). LCOW increased more when a brine concentrator was used. For both case studies, the ZLD system using high-recovery RO required less than 0.1% of a facilitiy's annual electricity generation and the ZLD system using a brine concentrator process required less than 0.8%. Additionally, increasing the evaporation pond area to minimize required ZLD system recovery rates and reduce system electricity costs does not reduce the LCOW. Instead, the LCOW increases because less water is recovered and more water is lost to evaporation. However, if water availability decreases or water competition/cost increases, facilities may be incentivized to maximize water recovery from ZLD systems.
AB - Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) systems installed at power facilities with the primary purpose of meeting water discharge regulations have the added benefit of providing high quality effluent that can be reused in the facility. This paper provides a review of water use in power sector recirculating cooling towers and a baseline assessment of on-site water reuse at natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power facilities. Two NGCC facilities with reverse-osmosis (RO) or brine-concentrator processes followed by evaporation ponds were selected as case studies; data from these facilities were used to quantify the water, energy, and cost implications of implementing conventional and emerging ZLD technologies. At one case study facility, model results show that implementation of ZLD would reduce water withdrawals by 18%, which is less than savings associated with implementation of dry cooling but comparable to current efforts to reduce water withdrawals by increasing cycles of concentration. Implementation of ZLD using high-recovery RO resulted in a doubling of the levelized cost of water (LCOW). LCOW increased more when a brine concentrator was used. For both case studies, the ZLD system using high-recovery RO required less than 0.1% of a facilitiy's annual electricity generation and the ZLD system using a brine concentrator process required less than 0.8%. Additionally, increasing the evaporation pond area to minimize required ZLD system recovery rates and reduce system electricity costs does not reduce the LCOW. Instead, the LCOW increases because less water is recovered and more water is lost to evaporation. However, if water availability decreases or water competition/cost increases, facilities may be incentivized to maximize water recovery from ZLD systems.
KW - brine concentrator
KW - closed-circuit reverse osmosis
KW - levelized cost of water
KW - thermoelectric recirculating cooling towers
KW - zero liquid discharge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140324604&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00377
DO - 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00377
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140324604
SN - 2690-0645
VL - 2
SP - 508
EP - 525
JO - ACS ES and T Engineering
JF - ACS ES and T Engineering
IS - 3
ER -